Wednesday, August 8, 2012

San Francisco, Day 2

Corry @ Pier 39 - San Francisco Awesomeness!

It has been another rather beautiful summer’s day here in San Francisco and we’ve managed to get out and enjoy it thoroughly!
After some uhm-ing and ah-ing about where to go for breakfast, we instead took the time to go to Gay Mecca, also known as the Castro.  Brightly coloured rainbow flags flapped in the wind as wandered aimlessly along the streets, just enjoying being out in the street and seeing what was to see.  
Riding the bus back into town, we then went out to Golden Gate Park.  Set amongst beautiful gardens are a number of attractions, including the California Academy of Sciences, the de Young Gallery and the Japanese Tea Garden.
 
The Academy is pretty amazing.  Starting from the T-Rex in the front entrance, the space features a vast range of exhibitions including a giant globe with a rainforest built in and the Planetarium.  Having never been to a planetarium before, this was particularly spectacular – an audio-visual immersion.
Then off to the de Young Art Gallery – if you are in San Francisco any time shortly, there is an exhibition on Jean-Paul Gaultier which is fantastic – the items walk the line between clothing and art like nothing I’ve ever seen.  Highly recommended.
Then another bus trip back into town and onto the Cable Cars.  While there’s quite a large queue (especially in the middle of summer apparently), it’s worth grin-and-bearing purely for the unadulterated touristy goodness of the experience.  Big smile on my face!
Dinner at Fisherman’s wharf, then back to the Hotel.
SF Tip of the day:  Ensure that you book Alcatraz well in advance – when we got there it was fully booked out for three weeks (D’oh!)
SF Tip of the day 2:  Coffee.  Corry need coffee.

Tomorrow:  Golden Gate Bridge Walk, Cartoon Art Museum, SFMOMA.  Should be a good day!

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Day Two (or is it day one...?)

Well, the 'day' started roughly 38 hours ago, dependant upon how you look at things (fun with time zones).  We are now safely in San Francisco, currently in a lovely large hotel room, pretty much smack dab in the middle of the City.  Both windows are open, the room has hardwood panelled floors and old-school ceiling fans.  Every now and then a bell rings from the San Francisco Cable Cars as Nick and I recover from jet lag.

So after the initial scare with Tongariro, everything else has gone very smoothly.  Caught up with the siblings for brunch and parents for donuts and coffee before flights commenced.  Everybody was perfectly right, you can worry about all sorts of things but once you're on that plane and the door is closed, all you can do is order a glass of wine and hope for the best.

Flight to Auckland:  Smooth
Flight to San Francisco:  Smooth - as can be expected.

I suppose one of the downsides of international travel is the super long flights.  Even if everything goes smoothly, aeroplane food is always sub-par.  There is ALWAYS a crying baby in the ailse over.  There is always the cramp in the leg right as you're trying to go to sleep.  Unless you drug up, sleeping is never long enough. And customs always takes too long

Strangely enough, one of the upsides of the travel is that personal TV screen you get.  Nothing to do with the movies or TV shows or music, but the flight data is fascinating!  Watching the plane move from its origin to its destiny, how high, how fast, very cool!

Anyway, we arrived safely in San Francisco and took the train into town.  Quick, easy option then a quick walk to the Hotel.  For those of you coming to San Francisco in the future, so far I'd higly recommend the Herbert Hotel.  The rooms are clean, tidy, and cost-effective.  They're well kept and, while they're not exceptionally well stocked with amenities, they have pretty much everything you need to keep going.

We've had a very busy afternoon so far!  We spent most of the afternoon walking - we saw the sea lions and Fisherman's Wharf on Pier 35, looked out and saw the Golden Gate Bridge and Alcatraz, wandered through Union Square, the shopping precinct and Chinatown, went through the Business District and saw the Transamerica Pyramid, then took lots of photos of Lombard Street.

Time to get some sleep and recover from jetlag - will post some photos up tomorrow.  Tomorrow holds a tour of Alcatraz and more than likely more walking.

Monday, August 6, 2012

Mountain goes KaBoom

We're almost ready to go.  Bags have been packed (... and re-packed... and packed again... and... well, you get the point), tickets and insurance have been bought, accommodation has been booked, friends have sent us off, flat has been broken down and cleaned to within an inch of its life, everything is as ready to go as it's going to be.

And then a mountain chooses to go 'boom'.  

Mount Tongariro, which hasn't erupted for 100 years, chooses today to go off.

I don't choose to mention this because it's going to affect our flights.  From what I understand, we should be able to fly over or around it, or whatever, so we should be fine.  But when you wake up at 7am in the morning on what is, more than usual, the first day of the rest of your life, on the day you choose to begin your adventures and leave the country which you've called home for 31 years, it worries you slightly.  And when your boyfriend starts running around like a chicken with its head cut off, well it doesn't help.

An omen, perhaps, on the rest of the journey?  A final send-off from the Island?  The Island breaking itself to pieces as we wing our way to the other side of the World?

Anyway, it really does reinforce how tentative one's plans can be, how easy it is for extensive plans to be made and then a reminder that Mother Nature can flip you the bird and suddenly all those plans can go up in smoke (or in this example ash).

Well ladies and gentlemen, here we go!  Our flight leaves in just over two hours, it should be a thoroughly exciting trip.  We'll keep you updated, keep the photos coming (not too many I promise) and will share all adventures with you.

On the flipside, if anyone can share their travel tips, or suggested places to visit, let me know.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

"Those lazy, ungrateful students!"


I'm reading some of the public feedback to the media's coverage of the government's suggested changes to funding for tertiary education, and I wanted to share my opinion on the subject.

"Talked to a bunch of them yesterday and half of them aren't 100% sure what they're protesting about. Embarrassing".

Actually, there is probably some truth to this.  Students have a bad habit of protesting just for the hell of it.  Hey, if you can march and cause a bit of havoc, so be it.  Such Fun (moist plinth).

However I would imagine that those who are organising the march have a good understanding of the political implications of this legislation.  Altering a student loan to be only four years rather than five years rules out the option of getting any government support beyond Honours Level.  This includes any students wanting to do a doctorate or even masters thesis.
  
This will limit those who get to do masters to those who want to gather HUUGE student loans, get further support from their parents or those who can get scholarships.   I get that a lot of students do get scholarships beyond Honours level, but not all of them.
New Zealand's wage gap with Australia is already large, and burdening those who can't afford to pay of their current student loans with more debt is only going to make it worse, with students heading off overseas to avoid these, and thus contributing to another economy.


"Shouldn't they be studying"

If they honestly believe that expressing their political views is worth taking a couple of hours off class, then that should be their decision.


Political expression is our right as New Zealanders.  Should nurses not have striked to ensure they get fair pay?  Meat workers?  Teachers?  Should those against apartheid not have protested in the Springbok tours?


"These people should try studying in America and see how much they like it there"


Comparing ourselves to others is all well and good, but we should be striving to have the best system we can.  Being better than someone else is not the same as being the best one can be.  Yes, we are lucky to have interest free student loans, to have our education heavily subsidised but there's always room for improvement.

"No they should get a job like most students to pay for study, no rely on other people to pay for them to live"

Most students only have time, at most, for a part-time job.  The way student loans and allowances are set up students can only earn so much money before it starts cutting into this.


And most students DO work.  They have part-time work during term and they'll work full-time over the summer to save for their studies, or to cover the gap in the support they'd otherwise have while studying.


On top of this, most students are expected to be studying 40 hours a week to meet course requirements.  Part of the labour movement is that people should only have to work 40 hours a week - should students be exempt from this?


So, by this logic, students should be expected to 60 + hours a week to earn enough money JUST TO SURVIVE?  Surely students would get better results if they were allowed to concentrate on their studies, rather than having to worry about balancing work and study and everything else that's happening at this important time in their lives.


I agree, students do gain personal benefits from education.  But so does society.  An investment in our brightest will ensure that we get the society we should be aiming for.


Students should have the CHOICE to work if they so see fit - if they want extra money for an occasional luxury, they shouldn't have to work just to cover the cost of living while studying a full-time week as well.



Come on folks, we are trying to have a highly trained, intelligent workforce able to move our economy forward.  We are trying to prevent our best and our brightest from leaving our country for more opportunities overseas.  Rather than providing more options for students, especially those from lower socio-economic demographics, it seems we are limiting higher education to those who can afford it.

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Another two cents in regards to the gay marriage debate.

So there's been a bit of a kerfuffle recently in regards to gay marriage.  Apparently some big wig has come out in support of it in the States, and, well, because the US is talking about it, it must be important.  And, because I'm that kinda guy, I'm going to put my voice into the argument.

As a point of interest and context, I think it's important to point out that John Key, despite all his recent talk of 'not being personally opposed to gay marriage' did vote against the Civil Union Legislation when it was last in the House.  It's interesting to see that it's only when Obama comes out in support of gay marriage that he begins to express positive (or at the very least neutral) views on the subject - where were these views when there were gay rights marches in Wellington for the last two years, such as the Legalise Love or the Queer the Night Rallies?  Hell, where were these when Tony Simpson wrote to Judith Collins earlier this year?  It's not until Obama actually takes an interest in the subject that suddenly Key becomes interested.  To paraphrase Jon Stewart, John Key has been taking the 'Mother' approach... "Well, if it were up to me darling, I'd let you go to the party.  I'd even buy you a six pack to take with you!  But you know how your father is with such things!"

But I digress.

First off, my personal stance.  I would never get 'married'.  I think marriage as we understand it in the Western construct has too much baggage behind it - the association with chattels, the strong Christian overtones are just two points of contention for me.  I wouldn't get married in the same way that, even if I believed in God, I wouldn't go to Church - I really don't want to belong to an institution that doesn't want me as a member. 

I know they're only a minority (in this country at least), but when you have conservatives coming out and making statements like 'the purpose of marriage is to provide a safe environment for legitimate offspring', that 'gay marriage weakens the institution', that 'it's a slippery slope.. What's next?  Legitimising polygamy?  Bestiality?', well, it's not an institution that I'm jumping up and down to be a part of.

That's why, personally, if my partner and I were to enter into a legal arrangement I would personally prefer a civil union of some description.  I think a legal recognition of our relationship that isn't mired in the history of marriage would suit me better.  My personal opinion is that civil unions also allow those who enter into them a certain amount more flexibility in how they choose to define this agreement outside of law than marriage, which comes with certain cultural expectations, however that's just me, I'm sure there are plenty of people in marriages who are choosing to define these relationships how they see fit as well.

The problem I have with civil unions in the New Zealand is that the Civil Union legislation falls short of securing the same rights, particularly in regards to family law - adoption and parenting laws are different.  However as someone who is not planning on having children any time soon, this really doesn't matter too much to me.

But despite my objections to the institute of marriage, I think gay and lesbians should be allowed to wed the person they love, if that's what they want.  While personally I disagree with the institution, I don't think my personal views on the subject, or the views of social conservatives, should influence law makers in this respect.  If those in the LGBT community want to enter into an institution that I personally disagree with, who am I to stop them? Their relationship, their marriage, does nothing to weaken the relationship I have with my partner.  It does nothing to weaken the marriage of Colin Craig or Mitt Romney or anyone else.

Also until Civil Unions offer EXACTLY the same rights as married couples, until they have exactly the same protections to families as those of marriages, warts and all, then Civil Unions will continue to be the poor cousin of marriages.  While Civil Union legislation as it stands is fine for me should I ever want to go through with it, it may not suit all the LGBT community. 

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Good and bad things to do on a weekend in Wellington

Good things...
  • Dinner at Fratelli.  Great Italian - try the venison risotto, to die for! Matched with a great bottle of Montepulciano and you're set.
  • Live Music at the Cavern Club. Great cover bands are a great excuse to dance badly and still have a fun time!
  • Cocktails at Apartment Bar - their Cointreau Cocktail menu is great, try the Jaffa Cake
  • Sunday Mornings at the Waterfront Market near Te Papa
  • Coffee at any one of the fine cafes around the city - Personal recommendations include Memphis Belle and Lamason
  • Brunch at Brooklyn Bakery - especially to soak up the alcohol the night before!
Bad Things...
  • Mixing wine, kahlua & milk and tequila shots, especially without eating dinner.  Your stomach will hold a grudge for a long time!
  • Drinking cheap sauvignon blanc.  Life is too short to drink bad wine
  • Getting caught in Wellington's weather.  While you can't beat Wellington on a good day, when it is bad it is grotty!

Good Friends

Good Friends...
  • Make the effort, be they on the other side of the street, city, country or world.
  • Know and revel in shared history, whether it be great or disastrous.
  • Know when to tell you the truth, when to tell you what you need to hear and when to shut the hell up.
  • Know when to take the piss and when to support.
  • Take you for who you are, but know when a change might be called for
  • Are just as happy to go out for big Friday night revelries as they are to have coffee and scones at yours on a Sunday afternoon.